Developing Argumentation Positions
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we first give three desiderata for tools intended to support the construction of arguments in a domain involving practical reasoning. We then review the computational properties of frameworks supporting these requirements, and conclude that these properties may present problems for some current approaches. We then offer an alternative approach satisfying the three requirements, and indicate where this may be supported by computer tools.
منابع مشابه
Analyzing CSCL-mediated science argumentation: how different methods matter
Research on argumentation has increased our understanding of knowledge construction, group learning, and scaffolding structures in CSCL although analyses of argumentation pose many difficulties. This could be due to the many theoretical positions that can be taken when approaching discourse data. In this paper, we use three popular analytic methods (interactional, content-specific, and linguist...
متن کاملThe Argument Interchange Format
While significant progress has been made in understanding the theoretical properties of different argumentation logics and in specifying argumentation dialogues, there remain major barriers to the development and practical deployment of argumentation systems. One of these barriers is the lack of a shared, agreed notation or “interchange format” for argumentation and arguments. In the last years...
متن کاملA Comparative Study of Argumentation- and Proposal-Based Negotiation
Recently, argumentation-based negotiation has been proposed as an alternative to classical mechanism design. The main advantage of argumentation-based negotiation is that it allows agents to exchange complex justification positions rather than just simple proposals. Its proponents maintain that this property of argumentation protocols can lead to faster and beneficial agreements when used for c...
متن کاملA Pilot Study in Using Argumentation Frameworks for Online Debates
We describe a pilot study in using argumentation frameworks obtained from an online debate to evaluate positions expressed in the debate. This pilot study aims at exploring the richness of Computational Argumentation methods and techniques for evaluating arguments to reason with the output of Argument Mining. It uses a hand-generated graphical representation of the debate as an intermediate rep...
متن کاملArgumentation for Scientific Claims in a Biomedical Research Article
This paper provides an analysis of some argumentation in a biomedical genetics research article as a step towards developing a corpus of articles annotated to support research on argumentation. We present a specification of several argumentation schemes and inter-argument relationships to be annotated.
متن کامل